[无量香光 · 显密文库 · 手机站]
fowap.goodweb.net.cn
{返回首页}


If you eat meat you are indirectly responsible the death of a creature?
 
{返回 Good Questions, Good Answers on Buddhism 文集}
{返回网页版}
点击:1548
If you eat meat you are indirectly responsible the death of a creature. Isn’t that breaking the first precept?
 
It is true that when you eat meat, you are indirectly and partially responsible for killing a creature but the same is true when you eat vegetables. The farmer has to spray his crop with insecticides and poisons so that the vegetables arrive on your dinner plates without holes in them. And once again, animals have been used to provide the leather for your belt or handbag, oil for the soap you use and a thousand other products as well. It is impossible to live without, in some way, being indirectly responsible for the death of some other beings. This is just another example of the First Noble Truth, ordinary existence is suffering and unsatisfactory. When you take the First Precept, you try to avoid being directly responsible for killing beings.

{返回 Good Questions, Good Answers on Buddhism 文集}
{返回网页版}
{返回首页}

上一篇:Mahayana Buddhists don’t eat meat
下一篇:Buddhists should be vegetarians, shouldn’t they?
 What is the point of Buddhism if on..
 How is that possible?
 So does Buddhism have a code of mor..
 But surely it is good to kill somet..
 What is the benefit of doing this t..
 But what about lying? Is it possibl..
 If the Buddha is not a god, then wh..
 How important are the scriptures to..
 Then why do people sometimes practi..
 But is there proof that such a dime..
全文 标题
 
【佛教文章随机阅读】
 安身、安心、安家、安业 安身-在于生活的勤劳俭朴[栏目:法鼓山智慧随身书·生活实用]


{返回首页}

△TOP

- 手机版 -
[无量香光·显密文库·佛教文集]
教育、非赢利、公益性的佛教文化传播
白玛若拙佛教文化传播工作室制作
www.goodweb.net.cn Copyrights reserved
(2003-2015)
站长信箱:yjp990@163.com